We investigate the motivations and effectiveness of corporate lobbying by analyzing public firms’ comment letters on the SEC’s proposed governance-related rules. We find that public firms predominantly submit pro-management comment letters and that these firms are often associated with weaker governance characteristics. Notably, public firms’ letters are more likely to be cited in final rules and lead to material changes aligned with their positions — particularly when advocating for pro-management changes. Moreover, public firms whose pro-management letters are cited in pro-management material changes experience significantly negative abnormal stock returns upon the release of the final rule. These findings suggest that public firms leverage the rulemaking process to protect entrenched managerial interests at the expense of shareholder value.
Access the paper via SSRN
corporate lobbying